“Если убрать из истории всю ложь, то это не значит, что останется только правда. В результате может вообще ничего не остаться.”
Непревзойдённый гений афоризма, Станислав Ежи Лец, ещё смягчил формулировки. На самом деле, вся официальная история, в любой конкретный момент времени – полное враньё. Мне повезло пережить несколько изменений “истории” на 180 градусов. Сначала – добрый дедушка Ленин, пионэры и прочие комсомольцы, разнарядки райкома на членство в КПСС, вот-вот построим коммунизм, скоро будет неминучая революция во всём мире. Потом, в 90-х – повторное разоблачение недоразоблачённого сталинизма, а заодно собрания выживших из ума старцев под именем “Политбюро ЦК КПСС”. Ну, а дальше всё пошло ещё интереснее – это вы уже и сами знаете.
И каждый раз история переписывалась заново. Благо, теперь для этого не надо изымать из библиотек книги и сжигать их на площадях. Теперь есть интернет и Роскомнадзор (в других странах его аналоги ), которые быстренько подчистят всю историю, сведения о которой деградировавшее население добывает исключительно из Гугл или Яндекс.
Поэтому с особым чувством уважения представляю вам Деймантаса – это не просто прекрасный профессионал в интеллидженс, но и источник такой исторической и аналитической информации, которая абсолютно неангажирована чьими-то интересами. Что дорогого стоит.
Когда-то меня один олигарх (не люблю это слово, ну пусть будет) спросил – а почему тебе надо платить в десять раз больше, чем другим? Я ответил так: – То, что ты хочешь слышать, ты сможешь услышать по дешёвке. Таких “специалистов” по лизанию разных частей тела – немеряно. Стоят они недорого. А вот услышать всё, как есть, без ударений и акцентов в силу личных пристрастий – это стоит других денег.
Поэтому я с нетерпением жду каждой новой публикации Деймантаса в ЛинкедИн и рекомендую вам его читать напрямую – вот ссылка на его профиль: http://bit.ly/2O52P0y
Я буду, по мере сил, сохранять его публикации на этом сайте. Настолько они значительны для понимания истории. Настоящей.
Вот его пост от 11.09.2018:
11.09.2018 Real timeline of War in Syria
1.September 2001, US Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld adopts strategy of Admiral Cebrowski. The state structures of half of the world will have to be destroyed. US will control the access to natural resources of regions not connected to the global economy. It starts with “reshaping” of Middle East.
2. December 12, 2003, Bush Jr. signed Act on restoration of Lebanese sovereignty.
3. 2004, at Arab League summit in Tunis, President Ben Ali tried to pass a motion authorizing the League to use force against member states that abide by Charter of Human Rights.
4. CIA organized Cedar revolution in Lebanon. Murder of Sunni leader Rafik Hariri pinned on President Assad, causing a Sunni uprising against Syrian forces.
5. In 2006, Cheney entrusted his daughter, Liz, to create ” Iran- Syria Policy and Operations Group” . She organizes Israeli attack on Hezbollah. The operation fails.
6. In 2008, PM Fouad Siniora decides to cut internal communications and stop air transport with Tehran. In a few hours, Hezbollah reinstates all of its infrastructure.
7. 2010, Obama administration entrusts attacks on Libya and Syria to UK and France (Lancaster House agreements).
8. 2011, start of war against Syria.
War against Syria is to have been declared by states (the “Friends of Syria”), but to have been practically conducted almost exclusively by non-state armies, the jihadists. During the seven years of this war, more than 250,000 combatants arrived from abroad to fight against the Syrian Arab Republic. It was certainly cannon fodder, people often insufficiently trained, but during the first four years, these soldiers were better armed than was the Syrian Arab army. The most important arms trafficking in history has been organized to supply them with war materials.Israel. Pursuing the colonial ideology of some of its founding fathers, Israel implements a policy of dividing its big neighbors into small ethnically or religiously homogeneous countries. He thus vainly supported the division of Lebanon into a Muslim state and another Christian, or the creation of a Kurdistan in Iraq, then in Syria. We do not have the Israeli strategic documents, but retrospectively, the line followed by Tel-Aviv corresponds to”Yinon Plan” of 1982 or that of the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies of 1996. The Israeli strategy is broadly in line with Rumsfeld and Cebrowski’s “remodeling of the wider Middle East”. However, it does not have the same objective: the Pentagon wants to control the access of developed countries to the wealth of the region, while Israel wants to make sure that none of its neighbors will be strong enough to stand up against him. The United Kingdom and France. The United Kingdom and France are renewing their colonial policy, as expressed at the time of the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the division of the Middle East (Sykes-Picot agreements). The British take over the “Great Arab Revolt of 1915” that Lawrence of Arabia had implemented against the Ottomans. At the time, they promised freedom to all Arabs if they overthrew the Ottoman yoke and placed the Wahhabis in power, this time they promise them freedom if they overthrow all their national governments and replace them by the Muslim Brotherhood . But neither in 1915, when the British Empire replaced the Ottoman Empire, nor in 2011, the Arabs will find their freedom. This is the plan of the “Arab Spring of 2011”..The French seek to restore the mandate that the League of Nations had entrusted to them over Syria. This is explained by Picot’s grand nephew (that of Sykes-Picot agreements), former President Giscard d’Estaing . And that’s what President Hollande wants during his trip to the United Nations in September 2015. As in 1921 France relies on the ethnic separation of Kurds from Arabs. It therefore defends the creation of a Kurdistan, not on its historical territory in Turkey, but anywhere, on Arab lands in Syria. TurkeyTurkey, meanwhile, dreams of fulfilling the promise of its founder, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the “Na tional Oath” ( Misak-ı Millî ), adopted by the Ottoman Parliament on February 12, 1920. She hears both annex northern Syria, including Aleppo, and eliminate Christians, including Catholics in Maaloula and Armenians in Kessab. It comes into conflict with other allies: with the Israelis because it wants to annex the North of Syria and not to empower it; with the British because she wants to restore the Ottoman Caliphate; and with the French because it opposes the creation of an independent Kurdistan in Syria. Above all, it comes into conflict with the United States itself because they do not make any secret of wanting to destroy it after dismantling Syria.